Skip to content

Conversation

@tmontaigu
Copy link
Owner

@tmontaigu tmontaigu commented Jul 13, 2025

First step of the upgrade process.

The smart_holder capabilities are probably going to interest us.

Some py::enum_ where empty, this made 'finalization' of pybind11's internals
fail, som we had to populate these enums.

@tmontaigu tmontaigu force-pushed the pybind11-3.0 branch 4 times, most recently from 7d9c9e3 to 51f0089 Compare July 14, 2025 17:25
First step of the upgrade process.

The smart_holder capabilities are probably going to interest us.

Some py::enum_ where empty, this made 'finalization' of pybind11's internals
fail, som we had to populate these enums.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants