doc: Rewrite manpage with scdoc #1816
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I'm not entirely sure if this is worth it. On the one hand, I think the source is clearer, easier to read, and easier to modify. However, scdoc has a few limitations and odd edge cases, that makes it a little awkward to work with. Another alternative is we could use ASCIIDOC with pandoc or asciidoctor to convert it.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not entirely sure if this is worth it.
On the one hand, I think the source is clearer, easier to read, and easier to modify.
However, scdoc has a few limitations and odd edge cases, that makes it a little awkward to work with.
Another alternative is we could use ASCIIDOC with pandoc or asciidoctor to convert it.