Don't accept queries arriving on alias interface if configured not to do this. #5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…do this. Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>
…interfaces to extend their scope to interface aliases. The man page does not mention that they are limited to "real" interfaces and stop working once an alias interface is specified (even if valid). Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>
DL6ER
force-pushed
the
label_interfaces
branch
from
c408653 to
14a9cf5
Compare
|
Rebased & submitted https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016057.html |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I found the following bug/misbehavior (whatever you wanna call it):
Real interface is eth0. an alias is created as eth0:0
Config --interface=eth0
Queries on eth0 and eth0:0 are accepted because dnsmasq only
compares the physical interface name string.
Config --interface=eth0:0
Queries on eth0 and eth0:0 are rejected (at first!) because of
the physical interface's name mismatch. But there is another
check "label_expection()" that does said iteration and would lead
to accepting the eth0:0 query. The eth0 query is correctly
rejected.
In an ideal world, we should reject also the eth0:0 query when
configured with "--interface=eth0". It can rather easily be done
when comparing the configured interface's IP addresses instead of
the name strings (or ifindex).
When doing this, the warn_wild_listeners() can be dropped
altogether as the strange behavior we used to warn about is
fixed.
The patch addresses this.
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q4/015938.html