-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
refactor: Rename optimize() -> try_optimize_tx_size() #617
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: snawaz/commit-diff-buffer
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR renames the trait method Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (1)📚 Learning: 2025-11-07T13:20:13.793ZApplied to files:
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs (2)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs (2)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs (2)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
b72b7e3 to
bc42634
Compare
aa4b132 to
1d13c07
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't mind the change to highlight what we exactly optimizing, but few points:
- This should be opened into
master, as it does not necessarily refer tocommit-diff-bufferbranch. Also this waycommit-diff-bufferbranch will be less noisy in diff withmaster - I'd prefer name
optimize_tx_size, since in theory we iteratively optimizing it and not doing it right away, at least in context ofTaskStrategist
Yes, that's a great name as well. We can keep that instead. Or maybe
Yes. It should have been onto And no, it wont be noisy. This PR wont merge to |
taco-paco
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think suggestion to rename to try_optimize_* makes the most sense.
1d13c07 to
c3a4ed4
Compare
367959a to
f19be9a
Compare
dd95c9a to
4a09180
Compare
2f0b47b to
53427bb
Compare
4a09180 to
17f396e
Compare
53427bb to
d0b2f04
Compare
17f396e to
3259f79
Compare
d0b2f04 to
26d1806
Compare
3259f79 to
23a797e
Compare
26d1806 to
ecea86a
Compare
5292303 to
65cb5d9
Compare
18adf1e to
5b95cad
Compare
3496b92 to
ad62c85
Compare
5b95cad to
82412ce
Compare
90bd9e1 to
ec0d2f5
Compare
2aada37 to
2eb5776
Compare
ec0d2f5 to
68c2b0c
Compare
9be6a8a to
b94a549
Compare
68c2b0c to
82708f8
Compare
b94a549 to
d445507
Compare
82708f8 to
0907290
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/task_strategist.rs (1)
465-479: Make the test fail iftry_optimize_tx_size_if_neededreturns an errorIn
test_optimize_strategy_prioritizes_largest_tasks, the call is currently ignored vialet _ = ..., so a signing/assembly error would still yield a “passing” test. Prefer asserting success:- let _ = TaskStrategist::try_optimize_tx_size_if_needed(&mut tasks); + TaskStrategist::try_optimize_tx_size_if_needed(&mut tasks) + .expect("tx-size optimization should succeed in this test");This keeps the behavioral assertions while ensuring unexpected errors surface as test failures.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs(1 hunks)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs(1 hunks)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs(1 hunks)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/task_strategist.rs(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs (2)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(87-100)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(79-81)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs (2)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(72-78)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(79-81)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs (2)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(87-100)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(72-78)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs (1)
87-99:ArgsTask::try_optimize_tx_sizecorrectly preserves prior behaviorThe Commit branch now clearly opts into
BufferTaskwhile other variants correctly returnErr(self)when no tx‑size optimization is possible, matching the updatedBaseTaskcontract. No functional issues spotted.magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs (1)
72-78: No-opBufferTask::try_optimize_tx_sizeis consistent with designReturning
Err(self)here is appropriate since buffer-based commits already move account data off the transaction and there’s no further tx‑size reduction to attempt.
d445507 to
cbbf5ee
Compare
0907290 to
1dd9fbd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs (1)
77-81: Fix typo inBaseTask::try_optimize_tx_sizedocumentationThe docstring still uses “buddled” instead of “bundled”.
- /// Optimize for transaction size so that more instructions can be buddled together in a single + /// Optimize for transaction size so that more instructions can be bundled together in a single
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs(1 hunks)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs(1 hunks)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs(1 hunks)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/task_strategist.rs(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-11-07T13:20:13.793Z
Learnt from: bmuddha
Repo: magicblock-labs/magicblock-validator PR: 589
File: magicblock-processor/src/scheduler/coordinator.rs:227-238
Timestamp: 2025-11-07T13:20:13.793Z
Learning: In magicblock-processor's ExecutionCoordinator (scheduler/coordinator.rs), the `account_contention` HashMap intentionally does not call `shrink_to_fit()`. Maintaining slack capacity is beneficial for performance by avoiding frequent reallocations during high transaction throughput. As long as empty entries are removed from the map (which `clear_account_contention` does), the capacity overhead is acceptable.
Applied to files:
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/task_strategist.rs
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs (2)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(87-100)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(72-78)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs (2)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(72-78)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(79-81)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs (2)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(87-100)magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/mod.rs (1)
try_optimize_tx_size(79-81)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/args_task.rs (1)
87-99:ArgsTask::try_optimize_tx_sizecorrectly implements the new trait contractCommit tasks are upgraded to
BufferTaskwhile non‑commit variants correctly returnErr(self), matching theBaseTask::try_optimize_tx_sizesemantics and the strategist’s expectations. No further changes needed here.magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/buffer_task.rs (1)
72-78:BufferTask::try_optimize_tx_sizecorrectly indicates no further size optimizationReturning
Err(self)for buffer‑based tasks is consistent with the trait’s contract and the design comment that buffers don’t further reduce tx size. This wiring looks good.magicblock-committor-service/src/tasks/task_strategist.rs (1)
56-58:try_optimize_tx_size_if_neededintegration and semantics look consistent
build_strategynow cleanly delegates totry_optimize_tx_size_if_needed, using the returned tx length for the size check and propagating realSignerErrors via?, while the helper preserves the “optimize heaviest tasks first” behavior and respectsOk(optimized_task)vsErr(self)fromBaseTask::try_optimize_tx_size. This matches the new naming and doc semantics without introducing functional regressions.Also applies to: 154-241
cbbf5ee to
8f7f30d
Compare
1dd9fbd to
5257d4d
Compare
8f7f30d to
74155a6
Compare
2980bf2 to
fe0e42d
Compare
74155a6 to
280eeb7
Compare
280eeb7 to
e3ce6e6
Compare
fe0e42d to
db32d00
Compare

The current name
optimize()is too generic and doesn’t convey what exactly to optimize for: space or performance?.Initially, I assumed it was meant for performance optimization, but after reading through the relevant code, especially
optimize_strategy(), I realized the optimization is actually about reducing transaction size.Changes:
optimize()→try_optimize_tx_size()optimize_strategy()→try_optimize_tx_size_if_needed()I think this makes the purpose explicit and avoids ambiguity. The function focuses on minimizing transaction size (not any size in general), not improving speed or compute efficiency.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.