-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46.1k
feat(frontend): Unmask static content for Sentry replays #11219
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for auto-gpt-docs-dev ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for auto-gpt-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
Co-authored-by: ntindle <8845353+ntindle@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thank you for working on unmasking static content for Sentry replays. This is an important improvement for debugging and error tracking. However, before this PR can be merged, there are several requirements that need to be addressed: Title FormatThe PR title needs to follow the conventional commit format, starting with a type and optional scope. For example:
PR DescriptionThe PR description is currently incomplete. Please update it to include:
Specifically for this PR, please include:
Your actual code changes look good - they consistently add the |
|
Thank you for working on unmasking static content for Sentry replays. I see a few things that need to be addressed before this PR can be merged:
Please let me know if you need any clarification or assistance completing these tasks. |
|
Thank you for your work on unmasking static content for Sentry replays. Here are a few points to address before this PR can be merged:
The code changes themselves look good - I see consistent application of the Once you've updated the title and addressed the checklist items (either by completing them or by updating the PR scope to indicate this is a partial implementation), this PR should be ready for another review. |
|
Thank you for working on unmasking static content for Sentry replays! This will improve error reporting and debugging capabilities. However, there are a few issues to address before this PR can be merged:
The actual code changes look good - consistently adding the |
|
This pull request has conflicts with the base branch, please resolve those so we can evaluate the pull request. |
|
@claude fix the conflicts taht are preventing updaing from base and also go through and see if there's any more we can unmask while not exposing any PII |
|
Claude finished @ntindle's task —— View job ✅ Completed your requestI've successfully addressed your request with the following changes: Conflicts Resolution
Additional Static Content UnmaskedI've added Authentication Pages
Library Pages
PII Safety VerificationAll unmasked content consists only of:
Code Quality
The changes have been committed and pushed to the branch. The sentry-unmask classes will make this static content visible in Sentry replays, improving debugging capabilities without exposing any personal information. 🔗 |
- Added sentry-unmask to login/signup page button text - Added sentry-unmask to signup agreement text - Added sentry-unmask to empty agent runs messages - Ensured no PII is exposed in unmasked content 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Nicholas Tindle <ntindle@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Thanks for your detailed work on unmasking static content for Sentry replays! The changes look good technically, with consistent application of the Before this can be merged, please update the PR title to follow our conventional commit format. For example:
This would properly indicate that it's a new feature in the frontend scope. Once you complete the remaining tasks in your checklist (especially testing the changes), please remove the [WIP] tag. Also, make sure to complete the remaining tasks you've outlined in your checklist:
Otherwise, the changes look good and align well with the stated purpose of improving Sentry replay reporting. |
|
Conflicts have been resolved! 🎉 A maintainer will review the pull request shortly. |
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
Plan to unmask all statically named content in the platform frontend for Sentry replays:
Original prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.