feat(shared-data, compoents): add tracking commands to runlog

[ryanthecoder]

Overview

add the typescript hooks for the aspirate/dispense while tracking commands

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 24.65%. Comparing base (82fb268) to head (6e692fa).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on edge.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...tring/utils/commandText/getPipettingCommandText.ts	0.00%	21 Missing ⚠️
...rganisms/CommandText/useCommandTextString/index.ts	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             edge   #19935      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   24.23%   24.65%   +0.41%     
==========================================
  Files        3540     3539       -1     
  Lines      298345   298225     -120     
  Branches    39863    39861       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits        72298    73517    +1219     
+ Misses     226029   224690    -1339     
  Partials       18       18              

Flag	Coverage Δ
app	2.10% <0.00%> (+1.17%)	⬆️
protocol-designer	18.70% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
step-generation	5.44% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...rganisms/CommandText/useCommandTextString/index.ts	60.92% <0.00%> (-0.38%)	⬇️
...tring/utils/commandText/getPipettingCommandText.ts	68.75% <0.00%> (-7.73%)	⬇️

... and 93 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[SyntaxColoring]

Yeah this looks basically right to me, thanks! Just small adjustments.

[SyntaxColoring]

A few things:

1. I think this case value needs to be aspirateWhileTracking instead of aspirate_while_tracking, to match what Protocol Engine puts in the commandType.
2. I would move the trackFromLocation and trackToLocation variable declarations inside the case block. That lets TypeScript narrow the type of command based on the fact that commandType === 'aspirateWhileTracking'. It will be able to see that command.params.trackFromLocation and command.params.trackToLocation will always exist, which lets you delete the trackFromLocation in command.params check.
3. Reminder to add a similar block for dispenseWhileTracking.