Skip to content

Conversation

@AAraKKe
Copy link
Contributor

@AAraKKe AAraKKe commented Oct 31, 2025

What does this PR do?

Brings the README for KrakenD.

Motivation

The README was never brought to this repo because it was created through the publishing platform. This was already approved by the @DataDog/documentation team in there. This is just to make sure that the integration has a proper README for anyone that lands here.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

@AAraKKe AAraKKe added qa/skip-qa Automatically skip this PR for the next QA assets/no-deploy Prevents APW from deploying this PR in staging labels Oct 31, 2025
@AAraKKe AAraKKe marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2025 14:59
@AAraKKe AAraKKe requested review from a team as code owners October 31, 2025 14:59
NouemanKHAL
NouemanKHAL previously approved these changes Oct 31, 2025
@temporal-github-worker-1 temporal-github-worker-1 bot dismissed NouemanKHAL’s stale review October 31, 2025 16:02

Review from NouemanKHAL is dismissed. Related teams and files:

  • agent-integrations
    • krakend/images/IMAGES_README.md
@AAraKKe AAraKKe added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 31, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 41cd584 Oct 31, 2025
48 checks passed
@AAraKKe AAraKKe deleted the aarakke/add-krakend-readme branch October 31, 2025 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

assets/no-deploy Prevents APW from deploying this PR in staging documentation integration/krakend qa/skip-qa Automatically skip this PR for the next QA team/agent-integrations team/documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants