Update notes

Author: cxy0714

notes/Master.bib

@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+@article{lin2025role,
+  title={The role of nudges in food choices: An umbrella review},
+  author={Lin, Hui and de Barcellos, Marcia Dutra and De Steur, Hans},
+  journal={Food Quality and Preference},
+  pages={105679},
+  year={2025},
+  publisher={Elsevier}
+}
+
+@article{shea2017amstar,
+  title={AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both},
+  author={Shea, Beverley J and Reeves, Barnaby C and Wells, George and Thuku, Micere and Hamel, Candyce and Moran, Julian and Moher, David and Tugwell, Peter and Welch, Vivian and Kristjansson, Elizabeth and others},
+  journal={bmj},
+  volume={358},
+  year={2017},
+  publisher={British Medical Journal Publishing Group}
+}
 @inproceedings{jamshidi2020peregrine,
   title={Peregrine: a pattern-aware graph mining system},
   author={Jamshidi, Kasra and Mahadasa, Rakesh and Vora, Keval},

notes/main.typ

@@ -250,4 +250,16 @@ Formulation in @van1991differentiable
   - Peregrine @jamshidi2020peregrine
   - Automine @mawhirter2019automine
 
+
+= Applications
+
+== Umbrella review
+
+See #link("https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/11/12/belief-in-the-law-of-small-numbers-as-a-way-to-understand-the-replication-crisis-and-silly-researchers-who-continue-to-cite-discredited-behavioral-research/")[`Belief in the law of small numbers as a way to understand the replication crisis and silly researchers who continue to cite discredited behavioral research`] by Andrew Gelman, but I just see the paper involved a title "umbrella review" @lin2025role, so I search more about umbrella review.
+
+Umbrella review consider the evidence form multiple meta-analysis and system review studies on the same topic. 
+
+using @shea2017amstar(10K+ citation!) to assess the quality of included meta-analysis/system review studies, but they did not provide a way to aggregate the quality scores and just give a subjective criteria, the overall confidence is rating as "high", "moderate", "low", "critically low". Produce an conclusion such that "In the 60 meta-analyses/systematic reviews included on the treatment for type 2 diabetes, treatments A have 5 strong evidence to support its effectiveness, while treatment B has only 1 moderate evidence to support its effectiveness..."
+
+
 #bibliography("Master.bib")