Skip to content

Conversation

@siraben
Copy link
Contributor

@siraben siraben commented Jun 2, 2023

Fixes #477

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jun 2, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@arcz
Copy link
Member

arcz commented Jun 2, 2023

Tests have to be updated too, you can run them with cabal run tests

@siraben siraben force-pushed the continuous-fuzzing branch 4 times, most recently from ce18f0d to d5e7bad Compare June 2, 2023 13:41
@arcz
Copy link
Member

arcz commented Jun 2, 2023

I think some tests might rely on the default test limit and they will hang now

@arcz arcz changed the title Make continuous fuzzing default Make continuous fuzzing an option Jun 5, 2023
@divyaranjan1905
Copy link
Contributor

Is there something specific stopping this from being merged?

@elopez
Copy link
Member

elopez commented Jul 25, 2025

I'm not sure, but I see there's conflicts on the PR. There's also an alternative PR we could opt for here #1302

@divyaranjan1905
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe that could be merged, it'd be a nice thing to have :)

@dguido
Copy link
Member

dguido commented Aug 25, 2025

@gustavo-grieco I think we should close this PR, in preference for #1302. What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Continuous fuzzing mode

7 participants